Re: Bug in SF?

> Could someone else please try this and report?

I have no problem when pasting only this example code.

I have noticed problem when including SINGLESTEP in some of my code. A
problem appear also here.

Charles

\ --------- modified test sequence ---------

only forth also definitions empty
requires singlestep

[debug

\ something like VOCABULARY from Forth-83
: wordlist:
    wordlist
    create ,

    does>
        @ >r \ send vocabulary to retstack
        get-order r>
        swap 1+ set-order \ add it to current search order
;

wordlist: testing

testing definitions

: aa ;
: bb ;
: cc ;

previous definitions

debug]

testing words

----------
> De : SF Talk <sftalk_at_forth.com>
> A : SF Talk <sftalk_at_forth.com>
> Objet : Re: Bug in SF?
> Date : jeudi 29 avril 1999 5:49
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:33:23 -0700
> From: "Rick VanNorman" <rick_at_forth.com>
> Subject: Re: Bug in SF?
>
> Elko,
>
> All I get when I paste this sequence into SwiftForth is:
>
> cc bb aa
>
> Also, if an error had been generated, SwiftForth should have caught
> it and it looks like, from your error message, that this was cut from
> the Windows error dialog box. Are you running an external error
> catching routine? Does the phrase "0 @" result in a SwiftForth
> error or a WIndows error?
>
> Could someone else please try this and report?
>
> Thanks,
> Rick VanNorman
>
> >\ something like VOCABULARY from Forth-83
> >: wordlist:
> > wordlist
> > create ,
> >
> > does>
> > @ >r \ send vocabulary to retstack
> > get-order r>
> > swap 1+ set-order \ add it to current search order
> >;
> >
> >wordlist: testing
> >
> >testing definitions
> >
> >: aa ;
> >: bb ;
> >: cc ;
> >
> >previous definitions
> >
> >testing words
>
>
>

.
Received on Thu Apr 29 1999 - 10:13:06 PDT