Rick,

> The system already places the names of imported functions into the
> vocabulary IMPORTED-FUNCTIONS, which is the same as the
> wordlist IMPORTS. What else do you have in mind?

Yes. But IMPORTS wordlist seems to be _always_ in the search-order.
How to remove it from the search-order is now my question:

only \ ok
order \ Context: FORTH Current: FORTH ok
' MessageBeep \ MessageBeep ? (ok)
1 IMPORT: MessageBeep \ ok
' MessageBeep \ MessageBeep ? (ok)
MessageBeep \ it beep, however it isn't in the search-order !
                                \ (I think: abnormal behavior)

Thanks for your previous response,

Charles

----------
> De : SF Talk <sftalk_at_forth.com>
> A : SF Talk <sftalk_at_forth.com>
> Objet : Re: Proposal: IMPORT: why not define in explicit dedicaced
wordlist ?
> Date : lundi 10 mai 1999 14:47
>
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 06:24:44 -0700
> From: "Rick VanNorman" <rick_at_forth.com>
> Subject: Re: Proposal: IMPORT: why not define in explicit dedicaced
wordlist ?
>
> >From: "Charles Melice" <mail_at_forthcad.com>
> >
> >Because Windows API have thousands of functions, I think it would be
better
> >to have a explicit dedicaced wordlist (as ASSEMBLER, etc.) to hide the
> >imported functions.
> >
> >The actual implementation generates a lot of problems and possible
> >confusions:
> >
>
>
> Charles,
>
> The system already places the names of imported functions into the
> vocabulary IMPORTED-FUNCTIONS, which is the same as the
> wordlist IMPORTS. What else do you have in mind?
>
> Rick
>

.
Received on Mon May 10 1999 - 17:41:49 PDT