OOPS. Must remember to engage brain *first*. Of course you are right.

Glad someone's paying attention!

Sorry,
Rick

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 12/11/2000 at 12:46 PM Mike Ghan wrote:

>> This is also a valid conclusion. I very often use PAD or HERE as that
>> temporary buffer. In a callback, which is the only place one would
>need
>> to reference this structure, PAD and HERE are both valid and
>guaranteed
>> *not* to be unique and free for use.
>
>> Rick
>
>Rick, am I missing something? My understanding is PAD and HERE are both
>created on and exist on the Windows message stack frame. This *would*
>make them unique for every message *and* transient - once the message
>exits, the stack frame is destroyed. Is this correct?
>
>Mike
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sftalk mailing list Sftalk_at_forth.com
>Visit Sftalk on the web at http://www.forthinc.com/mailman/listinfo/sftalk
Received on Mon Dec 11 2000 - 13:09:30 PST