The option there is to redefine / using FM/REM or SM/REM which
are the ans provided primitives. Unfortunately, they are not
very optimized in SwiftForth.
Rick
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 5/8/2000 at 11:46 AM SF Talk wrote:
>Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:29:43 -0500
>From: "Michael Kemper" <mikek_at_metretek.com>
>Subject: Re: Binary question
>
>There are options regarding this for FP Math, but I don't see how to do it
>with integer math without following Elizabeth's suggestion of redefining the
>"/" operator.
>
>I understand why it works the way it does...the question I originally posted
>had more to do with the issue of consistency of implementation. I'm not
>trying to be as critical as I probably sound.
>
>Thanks for the responses,
> Mike
>
>> Rick,
>>
>> Is there no option to choose symmetric or truncating division? I thought
>> I remembered that there is.
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
.
>From cahelber_at_uswest.net Mon May 8 14:58:45 2000
To: sftalk_at_forth.com
Message-Id: <m0000872_at_gerd.forthinc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:58:45 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Carl A. Helber" <cahelber_at_uswest.net>
Subject: SMATRIX
Rick,
I'd like to use the equivalent of SMATRIX in a colon definition rather
than having the matrix built through screen loading (sorry, I'm still
using blocks and BLKEDIT). Is there an easy way to do this or do I just
have to revise the coding shown in FPMATH?
Thanks,
Carl
.
Received on Mon May 08 2000 - 12:21:37 PDT
Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!
This archive was generated 09-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.