Fw: SMACRO - bad or good idea ?

Hello Gene, how are you ?

...
> Then there is no memory saving once the word is referenced a second
> time, and a considerable memory cost if you refer to a macro three or
> more times, since each time requires a complete macro expansion.
...

I have to agree with your remarks. I have put the file in my
(near to be full) "monstruosity" directory.

Thanks,
Charles

PS: I have noticed that I have now to use the "forward" button
to reply to SFTalk.
Received on Fri Sep 01 2000 - 07:11:42 PDT