![]() |
||
| Home | SwiftForth Archive | SwiftX Archive | |

Actually they don't. I'd bet that the address of ZZZ is 47A74F -- this
mode for [ECX] produces an effective address that is the value in ecx
plus the value on the stack.
Of course, I've been hasty at least twice today already ;^)
rick
On Tuesday, April 29, 2003, at 08:09 PM, Maristela Nunes Knowles wrote:
> Help! The assembler and disassembler disagree about the following:
>
>
> VARIABLE zzz
>
>
>
> code xxx
>
> zzz [ECX] DWORD FDIVR
>
> zzz [ECX] DWORD FDIV
>
> RET END-CODE
>
>
>
> SEE XXX
>
> 47A74F 47A734 [ECX] FDIV D8B134A74700
>
> 47A755 47A734 [ECX] FDIVR D8B934A74700
>
> 47A75B RET C3 ok
>
>
>
> I think the disassembler is right, but I thought I'd check anyway.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and bug
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Apr 29 2003 - 20:56:52 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 02 2008 - 03:04:32 PST