programming tools for Windows applications development
  Home  |   SwiftForth Archive  |   SwiftX Archive  |

Re: [Re: Importing overridden functions]

From: Jeff Massung <jma_at_mfire.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 08:51:17 -0600

Yes, "overloaded" is the proper term, I just mix them all up from time to=

time. Thank you. And I was afraid of the mangled names. Thanks for the he=
lp.

Jeff

"Conrad Weyns" <weyns_at_online.no> wrote:

> void Add(double x1,double x2,double &ret);
> void Add(int x1,int x2,int &ret);

I expect you mean overloaded. If you have exported the functions as c++
functions and not wrapped them in extern "C" blocks, they will have a
mangled name (return type and parameter types are coded in the name). You=

will need to find their corresponding mangled name.

regards,
Conrad Weyns.

jma_at_mfire.com
http://www.simforth.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and bug
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Sep 09 2003 - 07:58:33 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 03:04:09 PST