![]() |
||
| Home | SwiftForth Archive | SwiftX Archive | |

Yes, "overloaded" is the proper term, I just mix them all up from time to=
time. Thank you. And I was afraid of the mangled names. Thanks for the he=
lp.
Jeff
"Conrad Weyns" <weyns_at_online.no> wrote:
> void Add(double x1,double x2,double &ret);
> void Add(int x1,int x2,int &ret);
I expect you mean overloaded. If you have exported the functions as c++
functions and not wrapped them in extern "C" blocks, they will have a
mangled name (return type and parameter types are coded in the name). You=
will need to find their corresponding mangled name.
regards,
Conrad Weyns.
jma_at_mfire.com
http://www.simforth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and bug
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Sep 09 2003 - 07:58:33 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 07 2009 - 03:04:09 PST