Re: RE : Re: SwiftForth 3.0.2

Robert Dickow wrote:
> Yep... true. You have to use the right tool for the job.
>
> But that 10k constraint... I'd need to get SwiftX to do that I guess, since
> every SwiftForth app I've ever compiled to an exec had the whole business in
> there.
>
> If version 3 fixes that I'm buying.

Potentally, it does. The product now includes not only full source for
the kernel, but also the metacompiler that produces it (previously only
available with SwiftForth Pro). So you have complete control over what
you produce.

However, if you want to cross-compile for an ARM, SwiftX would certainly
be the better tool.

Cheers,
Elizabeth

--
==================================================
Elizabeth D. Rather   (US & Canada)   800-55-FORTH
FORTH Inc.                         +1 310-491-3356
5155 W. Rosecrans Ave. #1018  Fax: +1 310-978-9454
Hawthorne, CA 90250
http://www.forth.com
"Forth-based products and Services for real-time
applications since 1973."
==================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com      The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users.  For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------