Re: High Level Definition for U*/

Bee wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Bob Nash wrote:
>
> ...
>> P.S. I haven't had the time to test the CODE definition so kindly
>> transmitted by Anthony Senerechia, but I must admit it caused some
>> embarrassment: it didn't occur to me that both SwiftForth and GForth
>> use the same Intel processor (perhaps not the same register
>> assignments for Forth, but still ...). The CODE definition is
>> probably the better way to go.
>>
>
> Well... I use gforth on a PPC Mac, so the CODE definition would be of
> no use.
>
Exactly. GForth is C-based for portability, so processors may vary.

Cheers,
Elizabeth

-- 
==================================================
Elizabeth D. Rather   (US & Canada)   800-55-FORTH
FORTH Inc.                         +1 310-491-3356
5155 W. Rosecrans Ave. #1018  Fax: +1 310-978-9454
Hawthorne, CA 90250
http://www.forth.com
"Forth-based products and Services for real-time
applications since 1973."
================================================== 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com      The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users.  For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------