I agree. Zero (0) is not an unsignifiant digit.

The result should be 2345????.

In real application, SET-PRECISION is unusable.
I expect more a SET-DECIMALS word:

        2 SET-DECIMALS
        23456789 ok
        s>f f. 23456789.00 ok

Charles

-----Message d'origine-----
De : sftalk-bounce_at_forth.com [mailto:sftalk-bounce_at_forth.com] De la part de
Anil Rodrigues
Envoyé : mercredi 10 décembre 2008 17:59
À : sftalk_at_forth.com
Objet : [sftalk] number conversion significant digits

Would anyone volunteer whether this is expected behaviour,
if yes why so?

  ok
\ set Options/fpmath options -(disp.format) significant digits = 10: ok
  ok
  ok
23456789 ok
s>f f. 23456789.00 ok
  ok
  ok
\ set Options/fpmath options -(disp.format) significant digits = 4: ok
  ok
23456789 ok
s>f f. 23450000. ok
  ok

Seems to me display format shouldn't make me lose signif. digits?

Cheers! Anil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com For
list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com Message
archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and bug
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Dec 11 2008 - 01:42:52 PST