generating self-contained dlls: sf or swiftx?

From: Joel Reymont <joelr1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:37:14 +0000

I want to have a GUI app where I can paste some code and get a DLL as a result.

Should I use SwiftForth or SwiftX for this?

The context is compiling trading strategies written in EasyLanguage
[1] to machine code, to be loaded back into TradeStation [2] as a DLL.
Think improvement in security, speed, etc. This type of a small
self-contained Forth runtime can be loaded into all types of other
trading applications that normally don't understand EasyLanguage.

    Thanks, Joel

[1] http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2201
[2] http://www.tradestation.com

-- 
http://es.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com      The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users.  For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Jan 29 2010 - 05:37:36 PST

Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!

This archive was generated 09-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.