Re: generating self-contained dlls: sf or swiftx?

From: Joel Reymont <joelr1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:59:29 +0000

Eluzabeth,

What about -my- challenge, that of writing a compiler from a
moderately complex Pascal-like trading systems language?

Would that be a good enough opportunity to test your assertion?

I already have the compiler written in Haskell, OCaml and Lisp. I also
have no Forth baggage to bring to the table, just that of languages I
mentioned.

Last but not least, I have extensive experience in trying
implementations in varios languages to find the ideal one for the task.

Sent from my iPhone

On 31/01/2010, at 08:26, Elizabeth D Rather <erather_at_forth.com> wrote:

> I would love an opportunity to test that assertion on a challenge
> rather
> more complex than a "mere assembler".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jan 31 2010 - 00:58:58 PST


Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!

This archive was generated 09-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.