Re: generating self-contained dlls: sf or swiftx?

From: Marcel Hendrix <mhx_at_iae.nl>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:25:38 +0100

Joel Reymont <joelr1_at_gmail.com> writes Re: generating self-contained dlls: sf or swiftx?

> What about -my- challenge, that of writing a compiler from a
> moderately complex Pascal-like trading systems language?

> Would that be a good enough opportunity to test your assertion?

> I already have the compiler written in Haskell, OCaml and Lisp. I also
> have no Forth baggage to bring to the table, just that of languages I
> mentioned.

From your description I would expect it to be able to compile itself,
and I also expect that the higher-level parts of the trading system are
written in the language itself. So what is the minimal requirement for
the language basics?

-marcel

----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jan 31 2010 - 02:26:03 PST


Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!

This archive was generated 08-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.