On Jan 31, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Marcel Hendrix wrote:
> =46rom your description I would expect it to be able to compile =
itself,
What do you mean?
> and I also expect that the higher-level parts of the trading system =
are
> written in the language itself.
The trading system itself is written in the trading language. Here's an =
example of the auto-generated C# from my previous translator. The =
original trading language code is at the bottom of the post.
=
http://groups.google.com/group/topdog/browse_thread/thread/d5fd8feac8e6833=
1
I'm considering writing my new compiler in Forth. The 'runtime' of the =
new platform, i.e. the code dumped into the DLL would be written in =
Forth.=20
> So what is the minimal requirement for the language basics?
Can you please clarify?
Thanks, Joel
--- http://es.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont ---------------------------------------------------------------------- sftalk_at_forth.com The SwiftForth programming discussion email list To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is a forum for SwiftForth users. For product support and bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Sun Jan 31 2010 - 02:45:47 PST
Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!
This archive was generated 09-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.