forth compiler for a pascal-like trading language

From: Joel Reymont <joelr1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:45:19 +0000

On Jan 31, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Marcel Hendrix wrote:

> =46rom your description I would expect it to be able to compile =
itself,

What do you mean?

> and I also expect that the higher-level parts of the trading system =
are
> written in the language itself.

The trading system itself is written in the trading language. Here's an =
example of the auto-generated C# from my previous translator. The =
original trading language code is at the bottom of the post.

=
http://groups.google.com/group/topdog/browse_thread/thread/d5fd8feac8e6833=
1

I'm considering writing my new compiler in Forth. The 'runtime' of the =
new platform, i.e. the code dumped into the DLL would be written in =
Forth.=20

> So what is the minimal requirement for the language basics?

Can you please clarify?

        Thanks, Joel

---
http://es.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sftalk_at_forth.com      The SwiftForth programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to sftalk-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/sftalk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftForth users.  For product support and
bug reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Jan 31 2010 - 02:45:47 PST

Subscribe to our e-mail list service. It's free for all SwiftForth and SwiftX users!

This archive was generated 09-Feb-2012. Archive updated nightly.