Tilting at windmills

Ron Oliver <roliver_at_openesque.com> wrote:

>Maybe your application is over-complicated,

Yes...

> and needs to be re-thought

Yes...

> and simplified.

Yes...

And I am not going to do so. I don't have permission from the client
to do so, and I don't have enough time even if I had permission. I
have to do the best I can with the tools I have at hand. It's just
too bad there is no SWOOP for SwiftX, and it's too bad that Forth,
Inc. does not want to build it. A Class mechanism even with no
polymorphism would go a long way toward solving the namespace
pollution in a large application. But I appear to be tilting at
windmills.

--=20
Howard.Lee.Harkness_at_gmail.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swiftx_at_forth.com The SwiftX programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to swiftx-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to swiftx-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/swiftx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftX users. For product support and bug
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Jul 20 2005 - 14:06:08 PDT