embedded systems developers tools, cross compilers
  Home  |   SwiftX Archive  |   SwiftForth Archive  |

Re: Tilting at windmills

From: Ron Oliver <ron_at_openesque.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:27:36 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Howard Lee Harkness wrote:

> I have to do the best I can with the tools I have at hand.

[snip]

> It's just too bad there is no SWOOP for SwiftX, and it's too bad
> that Forth, Inc. does not want to build it. A Class mechanism
> even with no polymorphism would go a long way toward solving the
> namespace pollution in a large application. But I appear to be
> tilting at windmills.

Not necessarily, but you certainly won't get it in time to help with
your current situation. I too would like to have the ability to
have multiple target vocabularies...and without those, you can't
have a target SWOOP. I know very little about SWOOP, but I do
know that multiple wordlists are an essential part of it.

-- 
Ron Oliver <ron_at_openesque.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
swiftx_at_forth.com          The SwiftX programming discussion email list
To unsubscribe, send subject "unsubscribe" to swiftx-request_at_forth.com
For list command help, send subject "help" to swiftx-request_at_forth.com
Message archives are located at http://www.forth.com/archive/swiftx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is a forum for SwiftX users.  For product support and bug 
reports, please send email to support_at_forth.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Jul 20 2005 - 14:27:59 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Dec 02 2008 - 03:04:50 PST